Crest embroidery and printed marks
Whether the crest is stitched evenly without pulling the cloth, and whether printed marks hold a sharp edge.
The reading sequence
4 steps, starting at surface and finish and running to compare printed marks that sit beside the crest. Evidence on this point is read at E1, and 2 of the 4 steps carries a condition that ends the assessment outright.
Shoot the crest at macro with a scale touching it
Get one frame where the crest fills enough of the picture for thread to be counted and a scale sits against its edge.
Evidence: E1 — one macro photo per crest in indirect daylight, with a ruler or a coin laid against the crest edge and the surrounding 30 mm of cloth visible
- The crest fills at least a third of the frame and a scale touches its edge.
- Light is indirect, with no flash hotspot on the threads.
- The crest is close enough to read but no scale is in the frame.
- Flash is used, flattening the thread relief into a bright patch.
- Only full-shirt photographs are supplied, where the crest is smaller than a fingernail.
- The crest is turned away from the lens or half hidden by a fold.
Count stitches along one edge of the crest and look for glue
Decide whether the crest is stitched at a workable density, or attached as a pressed patch with no thread at all.
Evidence: E1 — the macro photo from step 1, examined along the lower edge of the crest over a measured 10 mm run
- A 10 mm run of the crest edge carries 12 to 16 stitches with no gap longer than one thread.
- Thread lies flat on the surface with no loops standing above the crest.
- The same run carries 8 to 11 or 17 to 20 stitches with an otherwise tidy edge.
- One short gap under 2 mm appears at a corner of the crest.
- The crest has no thread at its edge and shows a hard glossy line where it meets the cloth.
- A thread jumps more than 3 mm across the crest face.
- Embroidery crosses the crest outline by more than 1 mm along a visible edge.
Read the cloth around the crest under raking light
See whether the crest pulls the shirt into folds, which is what a dense embroidery pattern does to light knit fabric.
Evidence: E1 — one photo lit from the side at about 30 degrees, so any ripple around the crest casts a shadow
- Cloth within 5 mm of the crest lies flat with no shadow line under the light.
- No stiff rectangle shows through the cloth behind the crest.
- A shallow ripple within 3 mm of the crest presses flat under a thumb and stays flat for a minute.
- A soft outline shows on the inside of the shirt but not on the outside.
- Folds run more than 10 mm out from the crest and stay when the shirt is laid flat.
- The panel cups around the crest, so the shirt will not lie flat on a table.
Compare printed marks that sit beside the crest
Decide whether the printed elements on the same panel hold a clean boundary or have bled into the weave.
Evidence: E1 — one photo of the printed mark beside the crest, taken square to the panel at about 15 cm, with the crest in frame for size comparison
- A printed rule 1 mm wide stays unbroken along its whole length.
- Colour stops at the printed edge without bleeding more than 0.5 mm into the shirt.
- Fine lines break at one curve while staying legible at arm's length.
- Curved edges show slight stepping where the screen crosses a knit ridge.
- Printed lines blur by more than 1 mm or two colours overlap at a boundary.
- The print shows a dot screen at arm's length, or has flaked along a fold.
Why the thresholds sit where they do
Crest work fails in two unrelated ways that a single wide photograph merges into one impression, which is why density and pucker are counted and lit separately. Stitch count per 10 mm is used instead of a density grade because a count survives a disagreement about taste: two readers looking at the same macro photo arrive at the same number. The pucker step needs raking light for the same reason, since a ripple that is obvious in a side-lit photo disappears under a softbox. Raking light at about 30 degrees is the standard way to reveal a surface that has been drawn in, and the 10 mm limit is the distance at which a fold stops being a seam allowance and starts being a panel defect.
Common misreads
3 pairs recorded for this point. Each runs in both directions: 2 findings that looks worse than it is, and 1 that looks better.
- looks like Return actually Pass
A crest that shows a soft outline on the inside of the shirt. A dense crest presses an impression into the lining side of the knit and the outside stays flat.
- looks like Pass actually Query
A crest photographed square under even light with no scale. Even light hides both the pucker and the thread count, so the frame looks clean while proving nothing.
- looks like Return actually Query
A 2 mm gap in the stitching at one corner of the crest. Short gaps at a corner are common where the embroidery changes direction and often close under a light press.
Check this point against what you were sent
Insufficient evidence
Nothing decided on crest embroidery and print yet: 0 of 4 steps have been read.
0 of 4 steps judged
| Step | Reading | Evidence | Stop met |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shoot the crest at macro with a scale touching itneeds E1 | — | ||
| 2. Count stitches along one edge of the crest and look for glueneeds E1 | The crest has no thread at its edge and shows a hard glossy line against the cloth. A pressed crest has already flattened the weave under it, and it cannot be re-stitched without unpicking the shirt. | ||
| 3. Read the cloth around the crest under raking lightneeds E1 | Folds radiate more than 10 mm from the crest and remain when the shirt is laid flat. The cloth has been drawn in permanently around the embroidery and the panel will not press out. | ||
| 4. Compare printed marks that sit beside the crestneeds E1 | — |
Sources and checks
- Public community thread — Photo sets where crest density or pucker was the disputed pointn=63
- Editor analysis — 10 mm count run and 30 degree raking light chosen for repeatabilityno sample
Last checked · next review due · status current.
Compare current jerseys listings
Return to Jerseys: pre-purchase judging points, or read how verdicts are defined on the method page.