Sponsor print and panel alignment
Whether the marks printed on a shirt sit square to the panel seams they cross, or run off the piece.
The reading sequence
3 steps, starting at structural defects and running to compare the mark's centre to the placket and the crest. Evidence on this point is read at E1, and 2 of the 3 steps carries a condition that ends the assessment outright.
Shoot the chest flat rather than on a body
Get the chest panel flat enough that a printed block and its neighbouring seams can be read in one frame.
Evidence: E1 — one flat-lay photo per shirt with both shoulder seams, the placket and the chest mark in frame, and a tape measure laid along the hem
- The shirt lies flat with no fold crossing the printed block.
- Both shoulder seams and the placket sit inside the same frame as the mark.
- A tape measure lies in the frame at the hem, so the shot can be scaled.
- The shirt is photographed on a form, so the chest curves away from the lens.
- One fold crosses a corner of the printed block while the seams stay visible.
- Only worn photographs are supplied, where the panel curves with the body.
- The printed mark is out of frame, or soft enough that its edge cannot be found.
Read the gap between the print edge and the nearest seam at three points
Decide whether the printed block runs parallel to the panels around it, using three measured gaps rather than one glance.
Evidence: E1 — the flat-lay photo from step 1, with the three measuring points marked on screen at the left end, the centre and the right end of the block
- The three gaps between the print edge and the seam differ by 2 mm or less.
- The baseline of the printed block stays parallel to the hem line.
- The block clears the shoulder seam by the same distance on both sides.
- The three gaps differ by 3 to 5 mm across the length of the block.
- One corner sits closer to a seam than the rest while the other three are level.
- The printed block touches or crosses a seam at any point.
- The gap changes by 6 mm or more from one end of the mark to the other.
Compare the mark's centre to the placket and the crest
Check whether the chest mark is centred on the shirt and level with the crest, which is the pair a wearer notices first.
Evidence: E1 — one photo taken square to the chest with the whole shirt width in frame, so the placket, the mark and the crest can be compared on one line
- The centre of the mark sits within 3 mm of the shirt's centre line.
- The mark and the crest sit at the same height on both sides, within 2 mm.
- The mark is 4 to 8 mm off the centre line while the crest sits true.
- The mark is level, but the crest on one side sits lower by 3 to 5 mm.
- The mark is more than 8 mm off the centre line.
- The mark is rotated by more than 5 mm across its own length against the placket.
Why the thresholds sit where they do
Print on a shirt is laid after cutting, so any misalignment is either a placement error at the press or a pattern error at the table, and the two look different. Measuring three gaps rather than one separates them: a bent or rotated mark produces a gap that changes along its length, while a mark placed too low produces three equal gaps in the wrong place. A flat lay is required because a shirt on a body stretches across the chest and makes a printed rectangle look wider at the centre than at its ends. The 2 mm tolerance band comes from repeated measurement of the same shirt photographed twice at a fixed camera distance.
Common misreads
3 pairs recorded for this point. Each runs in both directions: 2 findings that looks worse than it is, and 1 that looks better.
- looks like Return actually Query
A mark that looks tilted in a worn photograph. Chest curvature tilts every printed block in a worn shot, which is why the flat lay in step 1 exists.
- looks like Pass actually Query
A mark sitting perfectly level on a panel with no tape in frame. Parallelism can be read without a scale, but the 2 mm band cannot.
- looks like Return actually Pass
A mark whose fine outline is uneven at the ends. Thin print borders break up on knit fabric during pressing and this is normal on a shirt that is otherwise square to its seams.
Check this point against what you were sent
Insufficient evidence
Nothing decided on sponsor print alignment yet: 0 of 3 steps have been read.
0 of 3 steps judged
| Step | Reading | Evidence | Stop met |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shoot the chest flat rather than on a bodyneeds E1 | — | ||
| 2. Read the gap between the print edge and the nearest seam at three pointsneeds E1 | The printed block crosses a seam at any point. Ink laid over a join has already been pressed and cured in the wrong place, and no amount of repressing moves it back. | ||
| 3. Compare the mark's centre to the placket and the crestneeds E1 | The chest mark is more than 8 mm off centre while the crest sits true. The panel was cut to the wrong size, and reprinting the mark would leave the old outline behind. |
Sources and checks
- Public community thread — Photo sets where a chest print was disputed as off centren=41
- Editor analysis — 2 mm band set by measuring one shirt twice at a fixed camera distanceno sample
Last checked · next review due · status current.
Compare current jerseys listings
Return to Jerseys: pre-purchase judging points, or read how verdicts are defined on the method page.